Description
Total length of the course: <1 hour
Strategy is harder than it looks, and the gap between tactical success and strategic achievement has undone more than a few military campaigns. In this conversation, explore how grand strategy differs across regime types, how Western and Russian approaches to air defence reflect deeper doctrinal divides, and what a warming ocean means for submarine warfare and great power competition. We then discuss what the demographics of the US military reveal about who actually bears the burden of modern conflict, and whether classic models of land warfare still hold today.
Content details
How does grand strategy differ between liberal democracies and authoritarian states?
You don't currently have access to this content
Are there historical examples where successful tactics undermined strategic goals?
You don't currently have access to this content
How do Western and Russian approaches to air defence differ in design philosophy and strategic intent?
You don't currently have access to this content
What is a ‘transparent ocean’ scenario? What strategic consequences might follow from it?
You don't currently have access to this content
Can you summarise the main arguments of your Texas National Security Review (TNSR) article, ‘Climate Change and Military Power: Hunting for Submarines in the Warming Ocean’?
You don't currently have access to this content
In 2022, you co-authored an article on the demographics of the U.S. Armed Forces. What is its main argument?
You don't currently have access to this content
Is Biddle’s model of land warfare still applicable to today’s conflicts?
You don't currently have access to this content